step-fitting algorithm matlab r2015b Search Results


90
MathWorks Inc step-fitting algorithm matlab r2015b
Step Fitting Algorithm Matlab R2015b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/step-fitting algorithm matlab r2015b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
step-fitting algorithm matlab r2015b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc zip-folder containing the code written in matlab r2015b for the stepfitting algorithm
Zip Folder Containing The Code Written In Matlab R2015b For The Stepfitting Algorithm, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/zip-folder containing the code written in matlab r2015b for the stepfitting algorithm/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zip-folder containing the code written in matlab r2015b for the stepfitting algorithm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc curve fitting tool in matlab r2015a
Curve Fitting Tool In Matlab R2015a, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/curve fitting tool in matlab r2015a/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
curve fitting tool in matlab r2015a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc matlab r2014b
Matlab R2014b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab r2014b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab r2014b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc curve fitting tool
Curve Fitting Tool, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/curve fitting tool/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
curve fitting tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc lsqnonlin
Lsqnonlin, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lsqnonlin/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lsqnonlin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc ode15s
Ode15s, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ode15s/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ode15s - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc matlab r2017b
Matlab R2017b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab r2017b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab r2017b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc nonlinear programming solver fmincon
Nonlinear Programming Solver Fmincon, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nonlinear programming solver fmincon/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nonlinear programming solver fmincon - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc curves fitting tool
Curves Fitting Tool, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/curves fitting tool/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
curves fitting tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc matlab r2018b
( A ) Time relative to metaphase of the highest rate of <t>mRNA</t> decrease for the 220 downregulated genes. For each gene a smoothing spline was fit to the data and the moment of maximum negative slope of the spline was determined (see Materials and methods). ( B ) Average slope of <t>mRNA</t> <t>levels</t> over time for genes that display immediate (thick red line) or delayed decrease (thick blue line). Thin red and blue lines show a random selection of 25 individual genes belonging to the immediate or delayed decrease group, respectively. ( C ) Validation of the two waves of mRNA decline. RPE-fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) cells at different stages of the cell cycle were isolated by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) based on FUCCI fluorescence (see for gating strategy). mRNA expression levels of indicated genes was measured by RT-qPCR. Five genes from the immediate decrease group and five genes from the delayed decrease group were selected. Note that the moment of decrease as measured by RT-qPCR closely mirrors the moment of decrease determined by modeling of our single-cell sequencing data (see ). Lines with error bars represent average ± SEM of three experiments. ( D ) Example images of TOP2A and CDK1 single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) at the different stages of mitosis. Asynchronously growing RPE-1 cells were fixed and stained for DNA (DAPI), membranes (WGA), and TOP2A and CDK1 mRNA (using smFISH). Scale bar, 10 µm. ( E–F ) Quantification of TOP2A ( E ) and CDK1 ( F ) transcript number in different stages of mitosis. Each dot represents the average number of transcripts in a single experiment and lines with error bars represent average ± SEM of three experiments (at least 15 cells per experiment per condition analyzed, see for the exact number of cells included). Single-cell TOP2A and CDK1 transcript counts are shown in . p-Values are based on a one-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, and are indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant.
Matlab R2018b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab r2018b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab r2018b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) Time relative to metaphase of the highest rate of mRNA decrease for the 220 downregulated genes. For each gene a smoothing spline was fit to the data and the moment of maximum negative slope of the spline was determined (see Materials and methods). ( B ) Average slope of mRNA levels over time for genes that display immediate (thick red line) or delayed decrease (thick blue line). Thin red and blue lines show a random selection of 25 individual genes belonging to the immediate or delayed decrease group, respectively. ( C ) Validation of the two waves of mRNA decline. RPE-fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) cells at different stages of the cell cycle were isolated by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) based on FUCCI fluorescence (see for gating strategy). mRNA expression levels of indicated genes was measured by RT-qPCR. Five genes from the immediate decrease group and five genes from the delayed decrease group were selected. Note that the moment of decrease as measured by RT-qPCR closely mirrors the moment of decrease determined by modeling of our single-cell sequencing data (see ). Lines with error bars represent average ± SEM of three experiments. ( D ) Example images of TOP2A and CDK1 single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) at the different stages of mitosis. Asynchronously growing RPE-1 cells were fixed and stained for DNA (DAPI), membranes (WGA), and TOP2A and CDK1 mRNA (using smFISH). Scale bar, 10 µm. ( E–F ) Quantification of TOP2A ( E ) and CDK1 ( F ) transcript number in different stages of mitosis. Each dot represents the average number of transcripts in a single experiment and lines with error bars represent average ± SEM of three experiments (at least 15 cells per experiment per condition analyzed, see for the exact number of cells included). Single-cell TOP2A and CDK1 transcript counts are shown in . p-Values are based on a one-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, and are indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant.

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Time-resolved single-cell sequencing identifies multiple waves of mRNA decay during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition

doi: 10.7554/eLife.71356

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Time relative to metaphase of the highest rate of mRNA decrease for the 220 downregulated genes. For each gene a smoothing spline was fit to the data and the moment of maximum negative slope of the spline was determined (see Materials and methods). ( B ) Average slope of mRNA levels over time for genes that display immediate (thick red line) or delayed decrease (thick blue line). Thin red and blue lines show a random selection of 25 individual genes belonging to the immediate or delayed decrease group, respectively. ( C ) Validation of the two waves of mRNA decline. RPE-fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) cells at different stages of the cell cycle were isolated by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) based on FUCCI fluorescence (see for gating strategy). mRNA expression levels of indicated genes was measured by RT-qPCR. Five genes from the immediate decrease group and five genes from the delayed decrease group were selected. Note that the moment of decrease as measured by RT-qPCR closely mirrors the moment of decrease determined by modeling of our single-cell sequencing data (see ). Lines with error bars represent average ± SEM of three experiments. ( D ) Example images of TOP2A and CDK1 single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) at the different stages of mitosis. Asynchronously growing RPE-1 cells were fixed and stained for DNA (DAPI), membranes (WGA), and TOP2A and CDK1 mRNA (using smFISH). Scale bar, 10 µm. ( E–F ) Quantification of TOP2A ( E ) and CDK1 ( F ) transcript number in different stages of mitosis. Each dot represents the average number of transcripts in a single experiment and lines with error bars represent average ± SEM of three experiments (at least 15 cells per experiment per condition analyzed, see for the exact number of cells included). Single-cell TOP2A and CDK1 transcript counts are shown in . p-Values are based on a one-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test, and are indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant.

Article Snippet: When mRNA levels start at a given value (m 0 ), the solution of results in the following expression for the mRNA levels over time. (2) m ( t ) = μ γ + ( m 0 − μ γ ) ⋅ e − γ t Furthermore, we assumed that mRNA levels remain constant before the onset time, resulting in the following pair of equations to describe the mRNA levels as cells progress from mitosis into G1 phase. (3) m ( t ) = m 0 t < t o n s e t m ( t ) = μ γ + ( m 0 − μ γ ) ⋅ e − γ ( t − t o n s e t ) t < t o n s e t For each gene, we optimized t onset (performed in Matlab R2018B) using an iterative search (between 0 and 370 min after metaphase in steps of 10 min), in which we optimized m 0 , μ, and γ using least square fitting for each t onset .

Techniques: Selection, Biomarker Discovery, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Isolation, Fluorescence, FACS, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Sequencing, In Situ Hybridization, Staining, One-tailed Test

( A ) Gating strategy for the identification of G1, early S, and G2 phase cells in fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of asynchronously growing REP-fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) cells (top). The tables below the FACS plot display the FUCCI-G1 fluorescence intensity associated with cells at various times in G1 or S phase. The top table shows the mean FUCCI-G1 fluorescence intensity during early S phase obtained. In the lower table, the left column states the time a cell has spent in G1 phase. The middle column indicates the FUCCI-G1 fluorescence intensities relative to cells in early S phase (calculated using the polynomial equation). The right column shows the range in absolute FUCCI-G1 fluorescence intensities in each bin. These intensities were calculated by multiplying the mean FUCCI-G1 fluorescence intensity in early S phase (6517, see top table) by the fluorescence intensity relative to S phase (middle column, lower table). The resulting fluorescence intensity ranges were used to set the sorting gates for the isolation of cells at different times in G1 phase. These gates are indicated in the FACS plot above. ( B–C ) Quantification of the number of TOP2A ( B ) and CDK1 ( C ) transcripts in different phases of mitosis. Each dot represents the number of transcripts in a single cell and lines with error bars represent average ± SD (at least 15 cells per experiment per condition analyzed, see for the exact number of cells included). One representative of three experiments is shown. ( D ) Fraction of mitotic cells in different isolated cell populations. Cells were either left untreated (asynchronous) or mitotic shake-off was performed to split the cells into two populations: Mitotic cells (collected cells from shake-off that are highly enriched for mitotic cells) and interphase cells (adherent cells remaining after shake-off that are depleted of mitotic cells). After isolation of different populations of cells, cells were fixed and stained with DAPI for DNA content measurements and for the mitosis-specific marker phosphorylated histone 3 ser 10, and the fraction of mitotic cells was determined by FACS for each cell population (see Materials and methods). Lines with error bars represent average ± SD of six experiments. ( E–F ) FACS strategies to enrich for G2 phase cells ( E ), early mitotic cells, or late mitotic cells ( F ). RPE-FUCCI cell populations depleted of mitotic cells ( E ) or enriched for mitotic cells ( F ) were isolated as in ( D ). The population of cells enriched for interphase cells (‘interphase’ in D) was used to isolate G2 phase cells. The population of cells enriched for mitotic cells (‘mitotic’ in D) was used to isolate early and late phase mitotic cells (prometaphase/metaphase and anaphase/telophase, respectively). Early and late mitotic cells were distinguished using FUCCI-G2 fluorescence levels: cells that express high levels of the FUCCI-G2 marker are early mitotic cells and cells that express low levels of the FUCCI-G1 marker are late mitotic cells. ( G–H ) Relative mRNA levels of indicated genes in G2, early and late mitosis, as measured by RT-qPCR. RPE-FUCCI cells in G2 phase, early and late mitosis were isolated by FACS (see E-F ). mRNA expression levels of five genes from the immediate decrease group ( G ) and five genes from the delayed decrease group ( H ) were analyzed. Dots and error bars represent average ± SEM of three to five experiments. ( I ) Crystal violet staining of wild-type and p53 knock-out RPE-FUCCI cells that were treated with Nutlin-3a for 1 week. A representative experiment of two experiments is shown. ( J ) Validation of p55 knock-out cells. Wild-type and p53 knock-out RPE-FUCCI cells were irradiated using 10 Gy of ɣ-irradiation, or left unirradiated. Five hours later, cells were lysed and CDKN1a expression was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Lines with error bars represent average ± SEM of three experiments. ( K ) Analysis of G1 phase duration and the fraction of G0 (quiescent) cells in p53 knock-out cells. RPE-FUCCI wild-type or p53 knock-out cells were imaged for at least 21 hr. The duration of G1 phase in cells entering G1 during the first hour of imaging was analyzed. G0 (quiescent) cells are defined as cells that maintain FUCCI-G1 fluorescence for >20 hr. Pooled data of two experiments is shown. Per cell line 20 cells were included per experiment. ( L ) Accumulation of the FUCCI-G1 fluorescence in wild-type and p53 knock-out RPE-FUCCI cells. Wild-type and p53 knock-out RPE-FUCCI cells were imaged by time-lapse microscopy. FUCCI-G1 fluorescence was determined for cells at metaphase and 2 or 4 hr thereafter. Fluorescence intensities were normalized against the average fluorescence intensity of wild-type cells at 4 hr post-metaphase. Bots and error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. At least 10 cells per condition per experiment were quantified (see ). ( M ) Validation of the two waves of mRNA decline. RPE-FUCCI p53 knock-out cells at indicated stages of the cell cycle were isolated by FACS (see A for sorting strategy). mRNA expression levels of indicated genes were measured by RT-qPCR. Five genes from the immediate decrease group and five genes from the delayed decrease group were selected. Dots and error bars represent average ± SEM of three to five experiments. ( N ) Correlation plot comparing the relative expression of immediate decrease genes to the relative expression of delayed decrease genes in single cells. Cells were selected that have spent at least 4 hr in G1 phase (158 cells in total). For individual cells, we averaged the expression of all genes belonging to either the immediate or delayed decrease groups, thus creating two metagenes. We then normalized the expression of both metagenes to the average expression of either metagene in G2 phase cells. Red dashed line represents the linear model fit to the data. For all panels, p-values are based on an unpaired one-tailed Student’s t-test. p-Values are indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant. See for the exact number of included cells in each condition.

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Time-resolved single-cell sequencing identifies multiple waves of mRNA decay during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition

doi: 10.7554/eLife.71356

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Gating strategy for the identification of G1, early S, and G2 phase cells in fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of asynchronously growing REP-fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) cells (top). The tables below the FACS plot display the FUCCI-G1 fluorescence intensity associated with cells at various times in G1 or S phase. The top table shows the mean FUCCI-G1 fluorescence intensity during early S phase obtained. In the lower table, the left column states the time a cell has spent in G1 phase. The middle column indicates the FUCCI-G1 fluorescence intensities relative to cells in early S phase (calculated using the polynomial equation). The right column shows the range in absolute FUCCI-G1 fluorescence intensities in each bin. These intensities were calculated by multiplying the mean FUCCI-G1 fluorescence intensity in early S phase (6517, see top table) by the fluorescence intensity relative to S phase (middle column, lower table). The resulting fluorescence intensity ranges were used to set the sorting gates for the isolation of cells at different times in G1 phase. These gates are indicated in the FACS plot above. ( B–C ) Quantification of the number of TOP2A ( B ) and CDK1 ( C ) transcripts in different phases of mitosis. Each dot represents the number of transcripts in a single cell and lines with error bars represent average ± SD (at least 15 cells per experiment per condition analyzed, see for the exact number of cells included). One representative of three experiments is shown. ( D ) Fraction of mitotic cells in different isolated cell populations. Cells were either left untreated (asynchronous) or mitotic shake-off was performed to split the cells into two populations: Mitotic cells (collected cells from shake-off that are highly enriched for mitotic cells) and interphase cells (adherent cells remaining after shake-off that are depleted of mitotic cells). After isolation of different populations of cells, cells were fixed and stained with DAPI for DNA content measurements and for the mitosis-specific marker phosphorylated histone 3 ser 10, and the fraction of mitotic cells was determined by FACS for each cell population (see Materials and methods). Lines with error bars represent average ± SD of six experiments. ( E–F ) FACS strategies to enrich for G2 phase cells ( E ), early mitotic cells, or late mitotic cells ( F ). RPE-FUCCI cell populations depleted of mitotic cells ( E ) or enriched for mitotic cells ( F ) were isolated as in ( D ). The population of cells enriched for interphase cells (‘interphase’ in D) was used to isolate G2 phase cells. The population of cells enriched for mitotic cells (‘mitotic’ in D) was used to isolate early and late phase mitotic cells (prometaphase/metaphase and anaphase/telophase, respectively). Early and late mitotic cells were distinguished using FUCCI-G2 fluorescence levels: cells that express high levels of the FUCCI-G2 marker are early mitotic cells and cells that express low levels of the FUCCI-G1 marker are late mitotic cells. ( G–H ) Relative mRNA levels of indicated genes in G2, early and late mitosis, as measured by RT-qPCR. RPE-FUCCI cells in G2 phase, early and late mitosis were isolated by FACS (see E-F ). mRNA expression levels of five genes from the immediate decrease group ( G ) and five genes from the delayed decrease group ( H ) were analyzed. Dots and error bars represent average ± SEM of three to five experiments. ( I ) Crystal violet staining of wild-type and p53 knock-out RPE-FUCCI cells that were treated with Nutlin-3a for 1 week. A representative experiment of two experiments is shown. ( J ) Validation of p55 knock-out cells. Wild-type and p53 knock-out RPE-FUCCI cells were irradiated using 10 Gy of ɣ-irradiation, or left unirradiated. Five hours later, cells were lysed and CDKN1a expression was analyzed by RT-qPCR. Lines with error bars represent average ± SEM of three experiments. ( K ) Analysis of G1 phase duration and the fraction of G0 (quiescent) cells in p53 knock-out cells. RPE-FUCCI wild-type or p53 knock-out cells were imaged for at least 21 hr. The duration of G1 phase in cells entering G1 during the first hour of imaging was analyzed. G0 (quiescent) cells are defined as cells that maintain FUCCI-G1 fluorescence for >20 hr. Pooled data of two experiments is shown. Per cell line 20 cells were included per experiment. ( L ) Accumulation of the FUCCI-G1 fluorescence in wild-type and p53 knock-out RPE-FUCCI cells. Wild-type and p53 knock-out RPE-FUCCI cells were imaged by time-lapse microscopy. FUCCI-G1 fluorescence was determined for cells at metaphase and 2 or 4 hr thereafter. Fluorescence intensities were normalized against the average fluorescence intensity of wild-type cells at 4 hr post-metaphase. Bots and error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. At least 10 cells per condition per experiment were quantified (see ). ( M ) Validation of the two waves of mRNA decline. RPE-FUCCI p53 knock-out cells at indicated stages of the cell cycle were isolated by FACS (see A for sorting strategy). mRNA expression levels of indicated genes were measured by RT-qPCR. Five genes from the immediate decrease group and five genes from the delayed decrease group were selected. Dots and error bars represent average ± SEM of three to five experiments. ( N ) Correlation plot comparing the relative expression of immediate decrease genes to the relative expression of delayed decrease genes in single cells. Cells were selected that have spent at least 4 hr in G1 phase (158 cells in total). For individual cells, we averaged the expression of all genes belonging to either the immediate or delayed decrease groups, thus creating two metagenes. We then normalized the expression of both metagenes to the average expression of either metagene in G2 phase cells. Red dashed line represents the linear model fit to the data. For all panels, p-values are based on an unpaired one-tailed Student’s t-test. p-Values are indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant. See for the exact number of included cells in each condition.

Article Snippet: When mRNA levels start at a given value (m 0 ), the solution of results in the following expression for the mRNA levels over time. (2) m ( t ) = μ γ + ( m 0 − μ γ ) ⋅ e − γ t Furthermore, we assumed that mRNA levels remain constant before the onset time, resulting in the following pair of equations to describe the mRNA levels as cells progress from mitosis into G1 phase. (3) m ( t ) = m 0 t < t o n s e t m ( t ) = μ γ + ( m 0 − μ γ ) ⋅ e − γ ( t − t o n s e t ) t < t o n s e t For each gene, we optimized t onset (performed in Matlab R2018B) using an iterative search (between 0 and 370 min after metaphase in steps of 10 min), in which we optimized m 0 , μ, and γ using least square fitting for each t onset .

Techniques: Fluorescence, FACS, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Isolation, Staining, Marker, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Knock-Out, Biomarker Discovery, Irradiation, Imaging, Time-lapse Microscopy, One-tailed Test

( A ) Violin plot showing the ratio of transcription in G1 phase versus G2 phase for the 220 genes that we identified as downregulated in G1 phase. Data were retrieved from . Battich et al. labeled new transcripts for 30 min using EU, and old and new transcripts were quantified using deep sequencing. We defined the relative rate of transcription as the number of labeled transcripts in G1 versus G2 phase. Dashed line indicates a ratio of 1, indicative of a similar transcription rate in G2 and G1 phase (a ratio <1 is indicative of reduced transcription in G1 phase). ( B ) Schematic of the mathematical model that was used to fit the decrease in mRNA levels as cells progress from mitosis into G1 phase. ( C ) Boxplot of mRNA half-lives for the genes that were identified as downregulated in G1 phase in our study. Half-lives at the mitosis-to-G1 (M-G1) transition are shown (this study), as well as the half-lives of the same genes determined in asynchronous cell populations in HeLa cells (Tani et al.), mouse embryonic stem cells (Herzog et al.) and mouse fibroblasts (Schwanhausser et al.). ( D ) Relative mRNA levels in mitosis after different times of transcription inhibition, as measured by RT-qPCR. RPE-1 cells were synchronized in G2 using the CDK1-inhibitor RO-3306. Subsequently, cells were released from RO-3306 into medium containing Taxol, to arrest cells in mitosis. Mitotic cells were collected by mitotic shake-off, and cultured for an additional 2 hr in the presence or absence of the transcription inhibitor Actinomycin D (blue and red lines, respectively). For comparison, mRNA levels during the M-G1 phase transition are shown (gray line). Note that mRNA of indicated genes is stable in mitosis, indicating that mRNA is degraded specifically during the M-G1 phase transition. Lines with error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. ( E ) Relative mRNA levels in G2 and late G1 phase after different times of transcription inhibition, as measured by RT-qPCR. Asynchronously growing RPE-fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) cells were treated with Actinomycin D for indicated times. Cells were then fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)-sorted and G2 phase cells and late G1 phase cells (>4 hr into G1 phase) were isolated based on FUCCI reporter fluorescence. The mRNA levels of indicated genes were then measured by RT-qPCR. mRNA levels during the M-G1 phase transition are shown for comparison (gray lines). Note that mRNA levels are substantially less stable in cells during the M-G1 phase transition compared to G2 or late G1 phase cells. Lines with error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. p-Values are based on a one-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test ( C-E ), and are indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant.

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Time-resolved single-cell sequencing identifies multiple waves of mRNA decay during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition

doi: 10.7554/eLife.71356

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Violin plot showing the ratio of transcription in G1 phase versus G2 phase for the 220 genes that we identified as downregulated in G1 phase. Data were retrieved from . Battich et al. labeled new transcripts for 30 min using EU, and old and new transcripts were quantified using deep sequencing. We defined the relative rate of transcription as the number of labeled transcripts in G1 versus G2 phase. Dashed line indicates a ratio of 1, indicative of a similar transcription rate in G2 and G1 phase (a ratio <1 is indicative of reduced transcription in G1 phase). ( B ) Schematic of the mathematical model that was used to fit the decrease in mRNA levels as cells progress from mitosis into G1 phase. ( C ) Boxplot of mRNA half-lives for the genes that were identified as downregulated in G1 phase in our study. Half-lives at the mitosis-to-G1 (M-G1) transition are shown (this study), as well as the half-lives of the same genes determined in asynchronous cell populations in HeLa cells (Tani et al.), mouse embryonic stem cells (Herzog et al.) and mouse fibroblasts (Schwanhausser et al.). ( D ) Relative mRNA levels in mitosis after different times of transcription inhibition, as measured by RT-qPCR. RPE-1 cells were synchronized in G2 using the CDK1-inhibitor RO-3306. Subsequently, cells were released from RO-3306 into medium containing Taxol, to arrest cells in mitosis. Mitotic cells were collected by mitotic shake-off, and cultured for an additional 2 hr in the presence or absence of the transcription inhibitor Actinomycin D (blue and red lines, respectively). For comparison, mRNA levels during the M-G1 phase transition are shown (gray line). Note that mRNA of indicated genes is stable in mitosis, indicating that mRNA is degraded specifically during the M-G1 phase transition. Lines with error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. ( E ) Relative mRNA levels in G2 and late G1 phase after different times of transcription inhibition, as measured by RT-qPCR. Asynchronously growing RPE-fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) cells were treated with Actinomycin D for indicated times. Cells were then fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)-sorted and G2 phase cells and late G1 phase cells (>4 hr into G1 phase) were isolated based on FUCCI reporter fluorescence. The mRNA levels of indicated genes were then measured by RT-qPCR. mRNA levels during the M-G1 phase transition are shown for comparison (gray lines). Note that mRNA levels are substantially less stable in cells during the M-G1 phase transition compared to G2 or late G1 phase cells. Lines with error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. p-Values are based on a one-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test ( C-E ), and are indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant.

Article Snippet: When mRNA levels start at a given value (m 0 ), the solution of results in the following expression for the mRNA levels over time. (2) m ( t ) = μ γ + ( m 0 − μ γ ) ⋅ e − γ t Furthermore, we assumed that mRNA levels remain constant before the onset time, resulting in the following pair of equations to describe the mRNA levels as cells progress from mitosis into G1 phase. (3) m ( t ) = m 0 t < t o n s e t m ( t ) = μ γ + ( m 0 − μ γ ) ⋅ e − γ ( t − t o n s e t ) t < t o n s e t For each gene, we optimized t onset (performed in Matlab R2018B) using an iterative search (between 0 and 370 min after metaphase in steps of 10 min), in which we optimized m 0 , μ, and γ using least square fitting for each t onset .

Techniques: Labeling, Sequencing, Relative Rate, Inhibition, Quantitative RT-PCR, Cell Culture, Comparison, Sublimation, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Fluorescence, FACS, Isolation, One-tailed Test

( A ) Violin plot showing the ratio of transcription in G1 phase versus G2 phase for the genes belonging to the immediate decrease or delayed decrease groups ( and ). Data were retrieved from . New transcripts were labeled for 30 min using EU, and old and new transcripts were quantified using deep sequencing. The relative rate of transcription was defined as the number of labeled transcripts in G1 versus G2 phase. Dashed line indicates supplemnetary filea ratio of 1, indicative of a similar transcription rate in G2 and G1 phase (ratios < 1 are indicative of reduced transcription in G1 phase). ( B–G ) mRNA abundance over time for genes that undergo mRNA decay at the mitosis-to-G1 (M-G1) transition. Blue lines indicate the best fit obtained using the mathematical model described in . Representative genes of the immediate decrease group (CDK1, TOP2A, and UBE2C) and the delayed decrease group (CENPA, ALR6IP1, and UBALD2) are shown. ( H ) Histogram of the time (relative to metaphase) when mRNA levels start to decline is shown for genes that are downregulated during the M-G1 phase transition. mRNA levels over time were fit as in B–G and the onset time of mRNA decline was determined for each of the 220 downregulated genes. ( I ) Histogram of mRNA half-lives for the 220 genes that are downregulated during the M-G1 phase transition. To obtain mRNA half-lives, mRNA levels over time were fit as in B–G and the mRNA half-lives were calculated using the mathematical model described in (see Materials and methods). ( J–L ) Comparison of mRNA half-lives during the M-G1 phase transition with mRNA half-lives in asynchronous cells determined in previous studies ( ; ; ). Dashed lines indicate identical half-lives. Note that the half-lives of most genes are shorter during the M-G1 phase transition than in asynchronous growing cells. ( M ) Boxplot of mRNA half-lives of immediate and delayed decrease genes. For each gene, the half-live was determined from the moment mRNA levels start to decrease (see ). ( N ) Analysis of transcription inhibition by Actinomycin D. Expression levels of the DNA damage-induced gene CDKN1a were measured by RT-qPCR in cells that were DNA damaged (exposed to 5 Gy ionizing radiation), in the presence or absence of Actinomycin D, relative to non-irradiated cells. Lines with error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. ( O ) Mitotic index of RPE-1 cells treated with the transcription inhibitor Actinomycin D. RPE-1 cells were arrested in G2 phase using a CDK1 inhibitor (RO-3306). After 16 hr, the CDK1 inhibitor was removed and replaced by Taxol, thereby releasing cells from the G2 phase arrest and blocking cells in mitosis. Forty-five minutes later, mitotic cells were collected through mitotic shake-off, after which Actinomycin D was added for up to 2 hr. Cells were fixed and the fraction of mitotic cells was determined by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) (by staining cells for DNA content and the mitosis-specific marker phosphorylated histone 3 at ser 10). Lines with error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. p-Values are based on a one-tailed Student’s t-test, and indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant.

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Time-resolved single-cell sequencing identifies multiple waves of mRNA decay during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition

doi: 10.7554/eLife.71356

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Violin plot showing the ratio of transcription in G1 phase versus G2 phase for the genes belonging to the immediate decrease or delayed decrease groups ( and ). Data were retrieved from . New transcripts were labeled for 30 min using EU, and old and new transcripts were quantified using deep sequencing. The relative rate of transcription was defined as the number of labeled transcripts in G1 versus G2 phase. Dashed line indicates supplemnetary filea ratio of 1, indicative of a similar transcription rate in G2 and G1 phase (ratios < 1 are indicative of reduced transcription in G1 phase). ( B–G ) mRNA abundance over time for genes that undergo mRNA decay at the mitosis-to-G1 (M-G1) transition. Blue lines indicate the best fit obtained using the mathematical model described in . Representative genes of the immediate decrease group (CDK1, TOP2A, and UBE2C) and the delayed decrease group (CENPA, ALR6IP1, and UBALD2) are shown. ( H ) Histogram of the time (relative to metaphase) when mRNA levels start to decline is shown for genes that are downregulated during the M-G1 phase transition. mRNA levels over time were fit as in B–G and the onset time of mRNA decline was determined for each of the 220 downregulated genes. ( I ) Histogram of mRNA half-lives for the 220 genes that are downregulated during the M-G1 phase transition. To obtain mRNA half-lives, mRNA levels over time were fit as in B–G and the mRNA half-lives were calculated using the mathematical model described in (see Materials and methods). ( J–L ) Comparison of mRNA half-lives during the M-G1 phase transition with mRNA half-lives in asynchronous cells determined in previous studies ( ; ; ). Dashed lines indicate identical half-lives. Note that the half-lives of most genes are shorter during the M-G1 phase transition than in asynchronous growing cells. ( M ) Boxplot of mRNA half-lives of immediate and delayed decrease genes. For each gene, the half-live was determined from the moment mRNA levels start to decrease (see ). ( N ) Analysis of transcription inhibition by Actinomycin D. Expression levels of the DNA damage-induced gene CDKN1a were measured by RT-qPCR in cells that were DNA damaged (exposed to 5 Gy ionizing radiation), in the presence or absence of Actinomycin D, relative to non-irradiated cells. Lines with error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. ( O ) Mitotic index of RPE-1 cells treated with the transcription inhibitor Actinomycin D. RPE-1 cells were arrested in G2 phase using a CDK1 inhibitor (RO-3306). After 16 hr, the CDK1 inhibitor was removed and replaced by Taxol, thereby releasing cells from the G2 phase arrest and blocking cells in mitosis. Forty-five minutes later, mitotic cells were collected through mitotic shake-off, after which Actinomycin D was added for up to 2 hr. Cells were fixed and the fraction of mitotic cells was determined by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) (by staining cells for DNA content and the mitosis-specific marker phosphorylated histone 3 at ser 10). Lines with error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. p-Values are based on a one-tailed Student’s t-test, and indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant.

Article Snippet: When mRNA levels start at a given value (m 0 ), the solution of results in the following expression for the mRNA levels over time. (2) m ( t ) = μ γ + ( m 0 − μ γ ) ⋅ e − γ t Furthermore, we assumed that mRNA levels remain constant before the onset time, resulting in the following pair of equations to describe the mRNA levels as cells progress from mitosis into G1 phase. (3) m ( t ) = m 0 t < t o n s e t m ( t ) = μ γ + ( m 0 − μ γ ) ⋅ e − γ ( t − t o n s e t ) t < t o n s e t For each gene, we optimized t onset (performed in Matlab R2018B) using an iterative search (between 0 and 370 min after metaphase in steps of 10 min), in which we optimized m 0 , μ, and γ using least square fitting for each t onset .

Techniques: Labeling, Sequencing, Relative Rate, Sublimation, Comparison, Inhibition, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Irradiation, Blocking Assay, Fluorescence, FACS, Staining, Marker, One-tailed Test

( A ) Quantification of CNOT1 expression levels following siRNA-mediated knockdown. RPE-1 cells were transfected with a CNOT1 siRNA, or a control siRNA-targeting luciferase. CNOT1 mRNA levels were measured by RT-qPCR at 48 hr post-siRNA transfection, and were normalized to CNOT1 expression levels in control siRNA treated cells. Lines with error bars indicate the average ± SEM of three experiments. ( B ) Cell cycle analysis of control- and CNOT1-depleted cells. RPE-fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) cells were transfected with indicated siRNAs. At 48 hr post-transfection, the cell cycle distribution was determined by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) using FUCCI fluorescence. ( C–D ) Quantification of TOP2A ( C ) and CDK1 ( D ) transcript number in individual cells. Asynchronously growing RPE-1 cells were transfected with indicated siRNAs. Forty-eight hours later, cells were fixed and stained for DNA (DAPI), membranes (WGA), TOP2A, and CDK1 mRNA (using single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization [smFISH]). A representative experiment of three experiments is shown. At least 10 cells per mitotic phase were included per experiment (see for the exact number of cells included). ( E ) Quantification of CNOT1 expression levels following CRISPR interference (CRISPRi)-mediated knockdown. RPE-FUCCI CRISPRi cells were infected with the indicated sgRNAs, and selected for successful infection using puromycin. Five days post-infection, cells were sorted into the indicated cell cycle fractions based on FUCCI fluorescence (see Materials and methods). CNOT1 expression was measured by RT-qPCR. Bars and error bars indicate the average ± SEM of three experiments. ( F ) Cell cycle analysis of control- and CNOT1-depleted cells. RPE-FUCCI CRISPRi cells were infected with CNOT1 sgRNAs as in ( E ) and the cell cycle distribution of cells was determined as in ( B ). Bars and error bars represent average ± SEM of three experiments. ( G ) Accumulation of the FUCCI-G1 marker in control or CNOT1-depleted RPE-FUCCI CRISPRi cells. Control and CNOT1-depleted RPE-FUCCI CRISPRi cells were imaged using time-lapse microscopy. FUCCI-G1 fluorescence was determined for cells at metaphase and 2 or 4 hr thereafter. Fluorescence intensities were normalized to the average fluorescence intensity of wild-type cells at 4 hr post-metaphase. Dots and error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. At least eight cells per condition per experiment were quantified. For all panels, p-values are based on an unpaired one-tailed Student’s t-test. p-Values are indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant. See for the exact number of cells included.

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Time-resolved single-cell sequencing identifies multiple waves of mRNA decay during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition

doi: 10.7554/eLife.71356

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Quantification of CNOT1 expression levels following siRNA-mediated knockdown. RPE-1 cells were transfected with a CNOT1 siRNA, or a control siRNA-targeting luciferase. CNOT1 mRNA levels were measured by RT-qPCR at 48 hr post-siRNA transfection, and were normalized to CNOT1 expression levels in control siRNA treated cells. Lines with error bars indicate the average ± SEM of three experiments. ( B ) Cell cycle analysis of control- and CNOT1-depleted cells. RPE-fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) cells were transfected with indicated siRNAs. At 48 hr post-transfection, the cell cycle distribution was determined by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) using FUCCI fluorescence. ( C–D ) Quantification of TOP2A ( C ) and CDK1 ( D ) transcript number in individual cells. Asynchronously growing RPE-1 cells were transfected with indicated siRNAs. Forty-eight hours later, cells were fixed and stained for DNA (DAPI), membranes (WGA), TOP2A, and CDK1 mRNA (using single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization [smFISH]). A representative experiment of three experiments is shown. At least 10 cells per mitotic phase were included per experiment (see for the exact number of cells included). ( E ) Quantification of CNOT1 expression levels following CRISPR interference (CRISPRi)-mediated knockdown. RPE-FUCCI CRISPRi cells were infected with the indicated sgRNAs, and selected for successful infection using puromycin. Five days post-infection, cells were sorted into the indicated cell cycle fractions based on FUCCI fluorescence (see Materials and methods). CNOT1 expression was measured by RT-qPCR. Bars and error bars indicate the average ± SEM of three experiments. ( F ) Cell cycle analysis of control- and CNOT1-depleted cells. RPE-FUCCI CRISPRi cells were infected with CNOT1 sgRNAs as in ( E ) and the cell cycle distribution of cells was determined as in ( B ). Bars and error bars represent average ± SEM of three experiments. ( G ) Accumulation of the FUCCI-G1 marker in control or CNOT1-depleted RPE-FUCCI CRISPRi cells. Control and CNOT1-depleted RPE-FUCCI CRISPRi cells were imaged using time-lapse microscopy. FUCCI-G1 fluorescence was determined for cells at metaphase and 2 or 4 hr thereafter. Fluorescence intensities were normalized to the average fluorescence intensity of wild-type cells at 4 hr post-metaphase. Dots and error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. At least eight cells per condition per experiment were quantified. For all panels, p-values are based on an unpaired one-tailed Student’s t-test. p-Values are indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant. See for the exact number of cells included.

Article Snippet: When mRNA levels start at a given value (m 0 ), the solution of results in the following expression for the mRNA levels over time. (2) m ( t ) = μ γ + ( m 0 − μ γ ) ⋅ e − γ t Furthermore, we assumed that mRNA levels remain constant before the onset time, resulting in the following pair of equations to describe the mRNA levels as cells progress from mitosis into G1 phase. (3) m ( t ) = m 0 t < t o n s e t m ( t ) = μ γ + ( m 0 − μ γ ) ⋅ e − γ ( t − t o n s e t ) t < t o n s e t For each gene, we optimized t onset (performed in Matlab R2018B) using an iterative search (between 0 and 370 min after metaphase in steps of 10 min), in which we optimized m 0 , μ, and γ using least square fitting for each t onset .

Techniques: Expressing, Knockdown, Transfection, Control, Luciferase, Quantitative RT-PCR, Cell Cycle Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Fluorescence, FACS, Staining, In Situ Hybridization, CRISPR, Infection, Marker, Time-lapse Microscopy, One-tailed Test

( A ) Effect of CNOT1 depletion on TOP2A and CDK1 mRNA abundance in different states of mitosis. Cells were transfected with indicated siRNAs. Two days after transfection, cells were fixed and TOP2A and CDK1 mRNAs were visualized using single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) (as in ) and the number of mRNAs per cell was determined. To calculate the relative abundance of mRNAs during mitotic exit, we divided the average number of mRNAs present in telophase by the average number of mRNAs present in prophase, prometaphase, and metaphase mRNA abundance is similar during these phases of mitosis . Relative abundance was used instead of absolute abundance, as the absolute number of detectable foci varied between experiments due to variations in labeling intensity of smFISH probes. Each dot represents a single experiment and lines with error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. Per experiment, at least 10 cells during mitotic exit and 10 early mitotic cells were quantified (see for the exact number of cells included). p-Values are based on a one-tailed Student’s t-test, and indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant. ( B–C ) Boxplot of poly(A) tail lengths in mitosis ( B ) and S phase ( C ) for immediate decrease genes, delayed decrease genes, or genes that are not subjected to mRNA decay (other genes). p-Values are based on a one-tailed Student’s t-test. ( E ) Expression levels of indicated mRNAs during the mitosis-to-G1 (M-G1) phase transition in control cells and cells depleted of CNOT1. RPE-fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) cells infected with control- or one of three different CNOT1-targeting sgRNAs were sorted into populations of G2/M phase and G1 phase cells at 5 days post-sgRNA infection. mRNA levels of indicated genes were measured by RT-qPCR. Data from three CNOT1-targeting gRNAs were averaged. Lines and error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. p-Values are based on a one-tailed Welch’s t-test. p-Values are indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant.

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Time-resolved single-cell sequencing identifies multiple waves of mRNA decay during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition

doi: 10.7554/eLife.71356

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Effect of CNOT1 depletion on TOP2A and CDK1 mRNA abundance in different states of mitosis. Cells were transfected with indicated siRNAs. Two days after transfection, cells were fixed and TOP2A and CDK1 mRNAs were visualized using single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) (as in ) and the number of mRNAs per cell was determined. To calculate the relative abundance of mRNAs during mitotic exit, we divided the average number of mRNAs present in telophase by the average number of mRNAs present in prophase, prometaphase, and metaphase mRNA abundance is similar during these phases of mitosis . Relative abundance was used instead of absolute abundance, as the absolute number of detectable foci varied between experiments due to variations in labeling intensity of smFISH probes. Each dot represents a single experiment and lines with error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. Per experiment, at least 10 cells during mitotic exit and 10 early mitotic cells were quantified (see for the exact number of cells included). p-Values are based on a one-tailed Student’s t-test, and indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant. ( B–C ) Boxplot of poly(A) tail lengths in mitosis ( B ) and S phase ( C ) for immediate decrease genes, delayed decrease genes, or genes that are not subjected to mRNA decay (other genes). p-Values are based on a one-tailed Student’s t-test. ( E ) Expression levels of indicated mRNAs during the mitosis-to-G1 (M-G1) phase transition in control cells and cells depleted of CNOT1. RPE-fluorescent, ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) cells infected with control- or one of three different CNOT1-targeting sgRNAs were sorted into populations of G2/M phase and G1 phase cells at 5 days post-sgRNA infection. mRNA levels of indicated genes were measured by RT-qPCR. Data from three CNOT1-targeting gRNAs were averaged. Lines and error bars indicate average ± SEM of three experiments. p-Values are based on a one-tailed Welch’s t-test. p-Values are indicated as * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), *** (p < 0.001), ns = not significant.

Article Snippet: When mRNA levels start at a given value (m 0 ), the solution of results in the following expression for the mRNA levels over time. (2) m ( t ) = μ γ + ( m 0 − μ γ ) ⋅ e − γ t Furthermore, we assumed that mRNA levels remain constant before the onset time, resulting in the following pair of equations to describe the mRNA levels as cells progress from mitosis into G1 phase. (3) m ( t ) = m 0 t < t o n s e t m ( t ) = μ γ + ( m 0 − μ γ ) ⋅ e − γ ( t − t o n s e t ) t < t o n s e t For each gene, we optimized t onset (performed in Matlab R2018B) using an iterative search (between 0 and 370 min after metaphase in steps of 10 min), in which we optimized m 0 , μ, and γ using least square fitting for each t onset .

Techniques: Transfection, Fluorescence, In Situ Hybridization, Labeling, One-tailed Test, Expressing, Sublimation, Control, Ubiquitin Proteomics, CRISPR, Infection, Quantitative RT-PCR